on animals or humans?
 |
Thread Tools
Rate Thread
Display Modes
06-09-2003, 12:01 PM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Take Kaiso In Yuh Mouth!!
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: QBNYC
Posts: 9,947
Credits: 1,717
|
on animals or humans?
should scientists be testing out new medicine's on animals each time (guinea pigs, lab rats, monkey's, etc.) or since the drugs usually in development r 4 human, it should be tested out on our species each/every time? animal rights activisits come speak up. :)
salt |
|
|
06-09-2003, 01:21 PM
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 5,381
Credits: 1,102
|
Hmm,
Then we wonder why some of the stuff doesn't work. My opinion, if you're trying to treat lions, then why test the drug on monkeys? The only problem is that for humans you need volunteers. Realistically, who is going to volunteer to test a new drug when they don't know what the side effect is? As an aside, I really honestly believe that's how the HIV/AIDS virus was started. A science experiment gone bad.... |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
06-09-2003, 01:52 PM
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Take Kaiso In Yuh Mouth!!
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: QBNYC
Posts: 9,947
Credits: 1,717
|
yeh i c where u' r coming from. how does the notion of testing new drugs on inmate's sentenced 2 death row? or would that be a whole legal mumbo jumbo right's issue?
salt |
|
|
|
06-09-2003, 02:01 PM
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 375
Credits: 210
|
yes it's kind of wierd when you put it that way. But like Topclass said no Human is not going to volunteer if they don't know side effects.
|
|
|
|
06-09-2003, 10:27 PM
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
SoCa ADdIcT-nEeD aH fIx
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Coconut City
Posts: 7,343
Credits: 770
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
