Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: Why is the Caribbean infrastructure so deadset against natural afro hair?

  1. #1
    Registered User Vye Negre is offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,015
    Credits
    17,193,571

    Why is the Caribbean infrastructure so deadset against natural afro hair?

    I know this case is specific to Barbados, but a little research will uncover that this is a Caribbean thing.

    Absolutely no locks! -- NationNews Barbados -- Local, Regional and International News nationnews.com

    COME MONDAY, Divisional Commanders of the Royal Barbados Police Force (RBPF) will have to report to their chief on which police officers are not conforming to the revamped dress code that came into effect on January 15.

    Yesterday, Acting Commissioner of Police Tyrone Griffith reiterated that there would be no revision of the policy in light of disagreement from some members, particularly regarding the restrictions on natural hair and the prohibiting of dreadlocks.
    It is understood that there are about a dozen female officers now sporting dreadlocks, including an officer at the rank of assistant Superintendent.
    A number of them were photographed by the WEEKEND Nation in attendance at the just concluded annual police conference with their locks neatly groomed in a bun style.

    - See more at: Absolutely no locks! -- NationNews Barbados -- Local, Regional and International News nationnews.com

  2. #2
    where de crix Oneshot's Avatar Oneshot is offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Brick City, NJ
    Posts
    24,668
    Credits
    40,160,677
    I can only speak for Dominica, we have the dread act, which made wearing dread locks illegal, but that was because them man were getting on bad, robbing, and even killing people.

  3. #3
    Registered User SKBai1991's Avatar SKBai1991 is offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    5,780
    Credits
    11,357,279
    Caribbean people have an inferiority complex in general and don't value themselves, their culture or their heritage. Which is pathetic considering how culturally rich we are.
    "sa ki ta'w sé ta'w, la rivié pé pa chayé'l "


    Father, before mi mind get bad
    Betta yuh flip it round and mek mi mind get mad
    Mi prefer fi work hard everyday fi achieve mi goals
    Nah grudge nobody fi dem own

  4. #4
    Registered User Poca's Avatar Poca is offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    home
    Posts
    4,202
    Credits
    87,553,099
    It'a simply a shame.

  5. #5
    Registered User iPicong's Avatar iPicong is offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    JC/Brazil 2014
    Posts
    51,424
    Credits
    44,178,436
    STATIC RADIO - www.islandmix.com/static
    Tunein Radio - Static Radio



    LR Advertising LLC

  6. #6
    Registered User iPicong's Avatar iPicong is offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    JC/Brazil 2014
    Posts
    51,424
    Credits
    44,178,436
    Somebody copy and paste dat dey ^^^^^^^
    STATIC RADIO - www.islandmix.com/static
    Tunein Radio - Static Radio



    LR Advertising LLC

  7. #7
    Registered User Seawall's Avatar Seawall is offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    maryland
    Posts
    4,328
    Credits
    11,321,991
    Right to wear braids
    John Sealy,
    Added 18 January 2015




    FLASHBACK TO 1986: Ingrid Quarless (left), and Richard Cox, executive manager of Grand Bay (centre), discussing the hairstyle issue with a police officer. (FP)

    Barbados Pride squad named for Leeward clash Read More Grand Draw Read More No funds for FIBA plan Read More EDITORIAL: Democracy more than elections Read More ALL AH WE IS ONE: Next steps Read More THE NETTE EFFECT: A matter of life and death Read More Second Harper Lee novel to be published in July Read More Robin Williams' wife, children fight over his estate Read More Messages of support for Bobbi Kristina Read More NATION newscast January 3, 2015 Read More Decline in chikungunya cases Read More Lifeguards rescue swimmer in difficulty Read More THE HOYOS FILE: Time for health care refund debate Read More CHTA’s mission: Make more money Read More Poorly trained spa workers ‘could harm tourist industry’ Read

    And how people wear their hair is always a matter that is ripe for heated debate.
    It was almost 30 years ago that 28-year-old Ingrid Quarless asserted her right to sport a braided hairstyle that conflicted with the preference of her then boss Alfred Taylor, general manager of the then Grand Bay Beach Resort at Aquatic Gap, St Michael.
    What transpired at the hotel on that Saturday mid-morning of November 23, 1986, not only ignited islandwide response but also landed before the courts of Barbados in a wrongful dismissal case.
    The English-born Quarless was the hotel’s social hostess from February 10, 1986, to November 21 the same year, when she claimed she was dismissed for having her hair in braids.
    The case held the attention of many Barbadians, who felt that asking a black woman to get rid of her braids was an affront to all people of African origin.
    Quarless was awarded $2 000 for winning the wrongful dismissal case.
    “I feel justified. My dignity and pride have been restored. I now feel good about myself again, about Barbados and about everything,” she told WEEKEND NATION of May 26, 1989, after winning her case.
    The impasse started when Quarless got two verbal notices from the activities director informing her that she would have to leave the property if she did not comply with an order to undo the braids. She said she was approached by the general manager in the lobby of the hotel and asked if she had got the message about her hair.
    She said she replied, “Yes” but also indicated that she did not understand and wanted to know the reason why she must undo her braids.
    Quarless told the SUNDAY SUN of November 23, 1986, that Taylor said he was the owner of the hotel and what he said went. And if she did not take out the braids she would have to leave the hotel.
    The demure Quarless stood her ground, saying that she was a professional woman and felt some proper notification was in order.
    Her concern was: “How can I be fired for having braids? Is there a rule in Barbados against having braids? I am a professional woman,” she pleaded.
    She even drew on the popular movie Colour Purple as impetus for her stand, which was about the rights of the black woman.
    Taylor would have none of that.
    When a SUNDAY SUN team landed at the hotel to get the story, Taylor trumpeted: “Complaints were received from members of the staff – and also guests – on the hairstyle of Miss Quarless. I spoke to her department head, Kim Edghill, that she [Quarless] could not continue working here if her hair was in such a condition.”
    Taylor also repeated the story to the Press that he had approached Quarless earlier and asked her if she got the message regarding her braids and the consequences of not removing them.
    But what seemed to anger Taylor even more is that “she proceeded to walk into a room she is not entitled to go into because I had told her leave the hotel . . . . She downright refused to leave the premises when the two owners had told her”.
    Taylor was not done with Quarless that Saturday morning. He summoned the law.
    “Am I misbehaving myself? I am just here to have a drink with my friends,” responded Quarless in quiet tone to the officer while in company of Richard Cox, executive manager of Grand Bay, discussing the hairstyle.
    The embattled Quarless was not standing alone.
    Guests Virginia and Michael Byford expressed surprise at how Quarless was being dealt with and frowned on the way the situation was being handled.
    “What management feels is their business, but we don’t find it [braids] offensive.”
    The Jaycettes and the Business and Professional Women’s Club of Barbados (BPWC) did not like what they heard either.
    “It sounds very discriminatory against women and more so against black women,” said then president of the Jaycettes, Donna Campbell.
    Dawn Morgan, president of BPWC, described the incident as “puzzling” and suggested that “there must be more in the mortar than the pestle”.
    Quarless also had the support of Adonijah in his column The Hot Line.
    “Someone needs to tell Alfred Taylor that this is 1986 and not 1786. The attitude that he displayed in his handling of the dismissal of the sister who worked at his establishment shows us all that ignorance is alive and flourishing in this island.”
    But Taylor had stuck to his position, saying that he did not dismiss Quarless for wearing braids but told the Press “when I call to tell you the vendors troubling my people on the beach, you don’t come, but some little incident which has no ground you run up here because you want to make a big scene . . . . No, no, I can tell you that. You all don’t rice me. This is Alfred Taylor. I can say what the hell I want . . .”.
    Magistrate Valton Bend, who presided over the matter in the District “A” Court, thought differently.
    While advising the management of the hotel to adjust to changing times and trends, he ruled that Quarless should have the personal freedom to wear her hair in the style she wanted.
    johnsealy@nationnews.com
    - See more at: Right to wear braids -- NationNews Barbados -- Local, Regional and International News nationnews.com
    "Every onlooker is either a coward or a traitor." — Frantz Fanon

    “If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters.” Frederick Douglass

  8. #8
    Registered User biggadon is offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    on de water
    Posts
    709
    Credits
    4,425,823
    When was this dread act put in to place ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Oneshot View Post
    I can only speak for Dominica, we have the dread act, which made wearing dread locks illegal, but that was because them man were getting on bad, robbing, and even killing people.
    LIONESS onda RISE likes this.

  9. #9
    Registered User LIONESS onda RISE is offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    13,118
    Credits
    1,063,611,852
    Quote Originally Posted by Oneshot View Post
    I can only speak for Dominica, we have the dread act, which made wearing dread locks illegal, but that was because them man were getting on bad, robbing, and even killing people.
    well..that still seems strange tho! outlawing a hair choice because some people committing crimes happen to have dreads? so all the people with caesar cuts that commit crime, or braids, or ponytails...they gonna outlaw that?

    kinda crazy
    Quote Originally Posted by biggadon View Post
    When was this dread act put in to place ?
    yes..curious
    jamaicangirl likes this.
    BELLY FULL BUT DEM STARVIN'

  10. #10
    Registered User biggadon is offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    on de water
    Posts
    709
    Credits
    4,425,823
    Am really curious ...my experience with Dominca is that nuff rastaman live deh... they are the Original RENT A DREADS !
    LIONESS onda RISE likes this.

  11. #11
    where de crix Oneshot's Avatar Oneshot is offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Brick City, NJ
    Posts
    24,668
    Credits
    40,160,677
    Quote Originally Posted by LIONESS onda RISE View Post
    well..that still seems strange tho! outlawing a hair choice because some people committing crimes happen to have dreads? so all the people with caesar cuts that commit crime, or braids, or ponytails...they gonna outlaw that?

    kinda crazy


    yes..curious
    it was in the 70's . it is an interesting part of Dominica's history, we were moving towards independance, and there was a spree of crimes being committed by young men, who identified as being part of the rasta / dread community. The act itself wasnt called the dread act, but Unlawful Societies and Associations Act which was replaced by the Terrorist Act. The law was draconian, it was meant to give the police the legal right to pull up any young man wearing dreads and lock him up, and beat him if they want. It was not about being pro european, it was mostly reactionary, and ended up setting up for a civil revolution in 79.

    Now, as it stands in practice people do not get arrested for wearing dreads, or being rasta and so forth. And children can go to school wearing their locks, and public servants I believe with the exceptions of police / prision wardens can wear locks. But the hair style restriction with the police I believe has to do more with a professional code. For example you dont see police officers with braids, or permed hair (men). The women can braid, or perm their hair as they see fit.

    Why the law hasnt been dropped, I suspect because people will see it as a pandering to that sect of society, and they will see it as victory to gain more freedoms, like burning cannabis. So rather than tackle a bigger issue, successive governments just look the other way.

  12. #12
    Registered User LIONESS onda RISE is offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    13,118
    Credits
    1,063,611,852
    ^^ Thank you!!! interesting piece of Dominica's history.

    none of us (countries/societies) are very far removed from the "black hair" thing. Just 20 years ago in the early 90's I was told not to loc my hair because I woulnt get a "good job"...

    to this day i'm the only person who looks like me (wherever my business takes)..and to be truthful, the odd looks and funky comments don't come from white folks...nope!! never! once!
    BELLY FULL BUT DEM STARVIN'

  13. #13
    Boonoonoonoos jamaicangirl's Avatar jamaicangirl is offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,827
    Credits
    11,636,899
    Quote Originally Posted by Oneshot View Post
    it was in the 70's . it is an interesting part of Dominica's history, we were moving towards independance, and there was a spree of crimes being committed by young men, who identified as being part of the rasta / dread community. The act itself wasnt called the dread act, but Unlawful Societies and Associations Act which was replaced by the Terrorist Act. The law was draconian, it was meant to give the police the legal right to pull up any young man wearing dreads and lock him up, and beat him if they want. It was not about being pro european, it was mostly reactionary, and ended up setting up for a civil revolution in 79.

    Now, as it stands in practice people do not get arrested for wearing dreads, or being rasta and so forth. And children can go to school wearing their locks, and public servants I believe with the exceptions of police / prision wardens can wear locks. But the hair style restriction with the police I believe has to do more with a professional code. For example you dont see police officers with braids, or permed hair (men). The women can braid, or perm their hair as they see fit.

    Why the law hasnt been dropped, I suspect because people will see it as a pandering to that sect of society, and they will see it as victory to gain more freedoms, like burning cannabis. So rather than tackle a bigger issue, successive governments just look the other way.
    We don't need white people to be racist towards us.....

  14. #14
    Registered User Vye Negre is offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,015
    Credits
    17,193,571
    Dominica's History Revisited

    Twenty-eight years ago in December, the Dominica Parliament under the leadership of then Premier Patrick R. John passed an amendment to the Prohibited and Unlawful Societies and Associations Act 1974(The Dread Act).

    The original Act was passed by near unanimous approval by Parliament earlier in the year. And so began one of the worst chapters in Dominicas history with the severe repression of human rights on the Island. Under the Dread Act, individuals wearing dread locks and who appeared in public were guilty of an offense and subject to an arrest without warrant.

    Young men found guilty of benign offenses such as taking one coconut from land that they did not own could face mandatory jail time without the right to appeal, if found guilty. The Act protected any civilian who killed or injured a member of the Dreads who was found illegally inside a dwelling house, from civil or criminal liability.

    In addition, the security forces received immunity from the killing of members of the movement. Passage of the Act therefore resulted in the killing of untold numbers of young men by the security forces. The Act has been regarded as the most shameful and repressive bit of legislation ever passed in Dominicas Parliament.

    To date, no one has ever been prosecuted, held to account, or made to pay for the carrying out of these atrocious deeds. As far as The Dominican could determine the repressive Dread Act, although no longer enforced still remains on the law books in Dominica, albeit to our eternal shame.

    At the time of the passage of the Act, the term Dread was used to refer to predominantly young men who practiced the Rastafarian religion, and grew their hair long and matted.

    Other words that were commonly used during that time as outlined by Premier John to Parliament in what he referred to as Dread langageu A small motion (to walk away); a piece (illegal firearm); Babylon (society); endless concrete (city buildings); endless man (large crowds); itals (vegetables and food not containing meat or salt); leggobeast (woman not accepting of Dread ideology).

    Editors Note:
    Much more detailed information on this era in Dominica's history including the rational advanced by the government for imposing the Act, the mood of the country at the time and the tumultuous events of Dominica in the seventies is detailed in Back to Eden available through The

  15. #15
    Registered User Vye Negre is offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,015
    Credits
    17,193,571
    Some say this was caused by Rastas becomming too influential with their grow what you eat philosophy threatening the economy.

    others say it was the 'bounjoir'/business owners/high socity types in Dominica who were threatened by young men congregating in town and wanted them removed who used their powers to influence this conspiracy against rastas.

    From what I understand it comes down to a small number of young men who were actually terorising Dominica at the time and the government of the day used the media to blow their actions out of proportion which provided the opportunity for them to introduce these draconian laws and indiscriminately try to eliminate rastas in the 70s.

    Its actually a very interesting chapter in our history, one I plan to reserach in the future.
    biggadon likes this.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •