Top Cop says gay men knew buggery is illegal in Dominica


Police Chief Cyril Carrette has confirmed that two men have been arrested and charged for engaging in an indecent act on the island.
The men who have been identified as John Robert Hart and Dennis Jay Mayer of Canada were arrested by police on the cruise ship after the illegal act was reported.
He said they will appear before the magistrates’ court on Thursday.
“We got a report that there was an unlawful act going on aboard the cruise ship which was in port. Police were dispatched and the persons were taken to the police headquarters where charges have been laid against them. The act of buggery was committed and there are witnesses saw this thing happening live,” he said.
Carrette says police were initially going to charge the tourist with buggery but “the process is a much longer one so we want justice to be swift to have these people leave our shore.
He said the tourist were cognizant of the fact that buggery is illegal in Dominica.
“The agent reported that the gay persons on board the ship were informed of the laws of Dominica. While we do not discriminate against anyone, we expect people, when they come to our country, to respect our laws because our country is sovereign,” he said.
According to Carrette plans have been made to have them repatriated.

ok then
But if they were on the ship, who snitched?

__________________

Those Who Sacrifice Freedom for Security Deserve Neither
www.cookingwithval.com
http://www.snackhealthy.com/snackwithval
@cookingwithval
@NicaBlack

The otHer man maybe snitched

must be.

It was a gay cruise right? So it must be the "man scorned" who tattled

__________________

Those Who Sacrifice Freedom for Security Deserve Neither
www.cookingwithval.com
http://www.snackhealthy.com/snackwithval
@cookingwithval
@NicaBlack

why would a gay cruise go to a place where there lifestyle is illegal?...

question: what is "buggery"? is it the act of anal sex? or anal sex with a man? im curious

__________________

nude woman- "I am strong, independent, successful, liberated and I can show my bressssssss"

man watching nude women- "oh yeah girl I agree, more bress and poosy"

jesus christ and god' "oh black people"

devil- "no comment"--Carlos the Great!

buggery is ass to mouth, u wah try it?

Son yuh OPEN homosexuality is very disturbing.

how could a big woman like that never hear about buggery, she playing dumb.

In English law, "buggery" was first used in the Buggery Act 1533, while Section 61 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861, entitled "Sodomy and Bestiality", defined punishments for "the abominable Crime of Buggery, committed either with Mankind or with any Animal". The definition of "buggery" was not specified in these or any statute, but rather established by judicial precedent.[1] Over the years the courts have defined buggery as including either:
anal intercourse by a man with a man or woman,[2] or
vaginal intercourse by either a man or a woman with an animal,[3]
but not any other form of "unnatural intercourse".[4] The implication being that anal sex with an animal would not constitute buggery. Such a case has not, to date, come before the courts of a common law jurisdiction in any reported decision. However, it seems highly improbable that a person would be exculpated of a crime associated with sex with animals only by reason of the fact that penetration involved the anus rather than the vagina.
At common law consent was not a defence;[5] nor was the fact that the parties were married.[6] In the UK the punishment for buggery was reduced from hanging to life imprisonment by the Offences against the Person Act 1861. As with the crime of rape, buggery required that penetration must have occurred, but ejaculation is not necessary.[7]
Most common law jurisdictions have now modified the law to permit anal sex between consenting adults.[8] Hong Kong did so retroactively in 1990, barring prosecution for "crimes against nature" committed before the Crimes (Amendment) Ordinance 1990 entered into force except those that would still have constituted a crime if they had been done thereafter. In the England and Wales, homosexual buggery was decriminalised in 1967 with a higher age of consent. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 fully removed buggery as a concept in British law, introducing an equal age of consent and not differentiating between vaginal and anal sex.
In the Republic of Ireland, the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act, 1993 abolished the offence of "buggery between persons".[9] For some years prior to 1993, criminal prosecution had not been made for buggery between consenting adults. The 1993 Act created an offence of "buggery with a person under the age of 17 years",[10] penalised similar to statutory rape, which also had 17 years as the age of consent. The Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2006 replaced this offence with "defilement of a child", encompassing both "sexual intercourse" and "buggery".[11] The act of buggery by way of bestiality is still unlawful under Section 61 of the Offences against the Person Act of 1861. In 2011 a man was prosecuted under this Section, after a woman died as the result of an allergic reaction after having intercourse with his dog.[12]
[edit]

the act of anal sex... whether it's between man and man or man and woman.

__________________

Those Who Sacrifice Freedom for Security Deserve Neither
www.cookingwithval.com
http://www.snackhealthy.com/snackwithval
@cookingwithval
@NicaBlack

its my favorite thing!
shut up azzwipe!!! i am an average american...ask the average american, and we never heard of the term "buggery"..ive seen it on this site, used in ref to homosexuality, but wanted an actual definition, so to be clear! dont assume i know anything. im not going to ask about something i already know simpleton!
wow!!!!...so even hetrosexyal ppl get arrested for this?

__________________

nude woman- "I am strong, independent, successful, liberated and I can show my bressssssss"

man watching nude women- "oh yeah girl I agree, more bress and poosy"

jesus christ and god' "oh black people"

devil- "no comment"--Carlos the Great!

According to the law yes...is it followed.. not at all.

There are homosexuals walking free in Dominica everyday and nobody pays them any mind. What they do behind closed doors is their business, but if they do it in public then that's another story.

I don't understand why those people in the article were arrested though. If they were on the ship, were they not doing the do in their cabin? Were they on the deck bulling it out?

__________________

Those Who Sacrifice Freedom for Security Deserve Neither
www.cookingwithval.com
http://www.snackhealthy.com/snackwithval
@cookingwithval
@NicaBlack

yes...does seem odd...

They better be careful they dont end up on the no dock list once dem gay and lesbian activist get a hold of the story..

__________________

nude woman- "I am strong, independent, successful, liberated and I can show my bressssssss"

man watching nude women- "oh yeah girl I agree, more bress and poosy"

jesus christ and god' "oh black people"

devil- "no comment"--Carlos the Great!

A good start.
People fi stap fuk batty.
Dat is unnatural.

__________________

Humans Against Trade Embargoes Tactically Neutralizing Trinindad

This is not the first time gay ships dock in Dominica though... and every time they come, the evangelical people protest.... the general population does not care.

__________________

Those Who Sacrifice Freedom for Security Deserve Neither
www.cookingwithval.com
http://www.snackhealthy.com/snackwithval
@cookingwithval
@NicaBlack