| View Poll Results: What to do about the defense? | |||
| Replace with individual defenders |
|
4 | 44.44% |
| Keep it the way it is |
|
5 | 55.56% |
| Do away with defensive options |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Flikkin Killa!
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Scorpion Valley Road
Posts: 10,454
|
IMFF Future Proposal
So I've pondered it quite a bit and I'm curious to hear your thoughts.
I would like to do away with the team defenses and instead we pick individual defenders. Maybe 1 safety 2 CBs and 2 DPs (DP=defensive player utility covering any defensive position) . I think this way we wont have to depend on having to absolutely have a team def to compete and as well allow us to have more reasonable scoring options. What do you think? If this is an acceptable change I would also want to expand the IR to 3 players and the bench to 7. I kinda feel we need it right now but that's a whole next episode. Last edited by Optimus Prime HD; 09-19-2008 at 12:13 PM. |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Jamaican Su'Flan
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Beating the Kette Drums inna NYC
Posts: 23,164
|
Keep it the way it is , Some ppl drafted they defense with a high pick. I had to take a loss last year because I didn't have a D/ST to play during the bye week some ppl have to feel it this year. Fair is fair! I did miss the playoffs by one game
![]() |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Gangsta Boogie
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: My business, Population...1
Posts: 38,223
|
I kinda like the team defense thing as is now... not opposed to the changes per se, but dunno that I'd change anything.
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
steups...
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Why, yuh comin by??
Posts: 3,329
|
I'm not here nor there with changing it. But if we do change it, it has to be next season. People will drop defenses after their bye week has passed and if someone only has one defense, it is only one loss. If someone's team missed the playoffs by one game because their defense had a bye, then I could see changing it.
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Flikkin Killa!
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Scorpion Valley Road
Posts: 10,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Destra's Harmony
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Orlando, FL.
Posts: 5,660
|
I'm for it, just for what JahPikne touched on....because they account for so much points, when your defense is on a bye, it's basically an automatic loss if you can't get a 2nd defense.
Doesn't really matter if we go all individual or keep the team defense though, either way, I'm happy. |
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
steups...
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Why, yuh comin by??
Posts: 3,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
OnE eYe MoNsTeR InC.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: DaVillE
Posts: 2,024
|
i hear what u sayin but like they said b4 there will be ppl out there who wont get 2 def's becuz of the depth of the league so i feel that what the commish proposed is cool juss for that fact alone.
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
steups...
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Why, yuh comin by??
Posts: 3,329
|
Either way is fine with me, regardless. |
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
OnE eYe MoNsTeR InC.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: DaVillE
Posts: 2,024
|
me personally im for the proposal but we will see what happens i'll work with it either way |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|


Thread Tools
Rate Thread
Display Modes



Linear Mode